Talk:Three Nations Crossing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename article[edit]

Since this bridge is now called the Three Nations Bridge, shouldn't the title of the article be changed to reflect that? JB 82^c 15:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Providing this isn't going to become a disabiguation nightmare, go ahead!!Bacl-presby 15:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DONE!!Bacl-presby 23:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody show a source for the rename? Not only are both the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Transport Canada still calling it Seaway, the bridge's owners are still calling it Seaway on their own website. Bearcat 00:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the bridge website: "Beginning January 1, 2000 the crossing occupied by the Seaway International Bridge was re-named the Three Nations Crossing in recognition of the Mohawks of Akwesasne." http://www.sibc.ca/info/info_e.html. The crossing was renamed, not the bridge. I believe this change should be reverted. Kirk 23:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Providing there are no conflicts, I'll do so! Bacl-presby 23:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DONE!

It is not one bridge it is two (South Channel and North Channel)that's why it's called a crossing. The Three Nations Crossing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.172.222 (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Three Nations Crossing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030095035/http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/contacts/ports/me/0104.xml to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/contacts/ports/me/0104.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong infobox[edit]

The article is currently using {{infobox port}} inappropriately given it is not about a port. I'd suggest it needs to be changed to {{infobox bridge}}. Any objections? Fob.schools (talk) 07:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]