Talk:Tiger shark

Tiger shark has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 17, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
July 14, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted
July 18, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tiger shark article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Sharks Top‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes High‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Length

How does something "grow up to 14–20 feet long"? Wouldn't that just be "grows up to 20 feet long"? 129.139.1.69 (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could use a sentence or two explaining how it came to be known as Tiger Shark. I certainly can't see any resemblance to a tiger, and would be interested to know. Rikeus (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very distinct striped pattern along the length of the shark on it's sides. In mature sharks, this often isn't as distinct, but it is very clear in juveniles. It's this pattern which gives them their name. douts (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental "cite error" - please help?

Somewhere in the numerous edits I just made to the article I appear to have messed up two of the references. I mean well but am by no means an expert on using this website - could someone please look into it and fix this error? I tried to find it but I cannot figure out where I went wrong. PLEASE DO NOT SIMPLY REVERT MY EDITS; I spent quite a while improving the accuracy of this article and would hate to see all that work go to waste. Thanks.

Please be more specific - which references did you mess up and in what sense? Materialscientist (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tiger shark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/07/24/hammerhead_ani.html?category=earth&guid=20060724100030

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin name

Shouldn't this article mention that the tiger shark's Latin name commemorates Georges Cuvier? Georges_Cuvier

Flizzjkzaop (talk) 21:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as someone finds a reliable source, absolutely.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Killer whales' vs Orca

The colloquial name 'killer whale' is dated and carries negative, inaccurate connotations. I propose referring to these animals in another way.

Seconded, FWIW. I just tweaked some things and stuck to “killer whale” for consistency and to avoid opening exactly this can of worms, but am not comfortable with this. Jdickinson (talk) 05:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect request on Thursday, November 17th, 2022

I need to add an {{About}} template on the {{other uses}} hatnote, please. It should look like this: "This article is about the cartilaginous fish. For other uses, see Tiger shark (disambiguation)." Also, I suggest that an administrator, particularly Oshawa, remove the protection template. 2607:FEA8:FD04:8132:D90A:8690:B70C:A720 (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy — article text disagrees with infobox

The text makes several references to this being in family Galeocerdonidae (as the last extant member) but the infobox states they're in family Carcharhinidae. Any shark taxonomy nerds out there have a good source to fix this? Dustinlamont (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lakes

In the Tiger shark range map, the species is erroneously shown to inhabit Lake Nicaragua and Lake Titicaca. There are Bull sharks in the former, not Tiger sharks. Would someone who is able please correct the map. Thank you. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]