Talk:Til I Forget About You

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Big Time Rush.

On 9 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Til I Forget About You (song) to Til I Forget About You. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 9 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 20:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Til I Forget About You (song) → Til I Forget About You – Only article with this title so it doesn't need to have "(song)" in the title. FanDePopLatino (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Big Time Rush. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@In ictu oculi: why do you want it redirected? The song was originally redirected because it was created without proper sources to establish notability. The article was recreated with sources, charts, and a certification to meet notability. This discussion is not about deleting the song's article but instead it is to move it (change the article's name).FanDePopLatino (talk) 21:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: There's no need to redirect the page, the song is notable enough to keep the article here on Wikipedia: it appeared in weekly and annual charts, it earned certifications and with a Google search you can find some publications in which it appears. I also believe that there is no need to keep the (song) in the title, because as already mentioned, it is the only article on Wikipedia with that name.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 15:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support, excessive disambiguation, should be uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 20:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.