Talk:Timothy Shortell
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
BLP violations removed
[edit]Nothing in this article supports the following, and as this is a BLP, it has been removed to this page. If you have multiple reliable sourcing, please show it. Horowitz is not widely seen as reliabble and he is running a campaign to fill Wikipedia up with claims from his book. Skywriter (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC) Consequently, when CUNY voted narrowly (by seven votes to five) to promote Shortell to full professorship in 2005 there was a sense of outrage from conservative students, who believed that he would be biased against religious people and that he was trying to follow Nietzsche's doctrine of the Übermensch when he said that Christianity and capitalism demanded "weakness" of their adherents[1].
References
- ^ See David Horowitz; The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America; p. 328 ISBN 0895260034
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Unknown-importance sociology articles