Talk:Turbot
This level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wrong/bad linking
[edit]Family Scophthalmidae is linked to Genus Psetta maxima. This is not correct since family is not genus. The linking must be corrected.
ICE77 -- 84.223.77.125 22:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
(hopefully) sorted. Scophthalmidae is now an article. Totnesmartin 12:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Pronunication
[edit]Writing the word with different letters in this fashion is not useful. I can't think of any way in which 'turbit' relates to any pronunciation of the name of this fish that is useful.
Photo
[edit]What on earth (or in the sea) is that supposed to be a photo of?
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed Link
[edit]The copyrighted web page at http://www.pacseafood.com/products/flounder.html has much useful information about nomenclature and its misuse in the marketplace. It might be good to add it as an external reference. peter (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Current taxonomic status
[edit]Now it is related to Scophthalmus, see: Bailly N., Chanet B. (2010) Scophthalmus Rafinesque, 1810: The valid generic name for the turbot, S. maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) [Pleuronectiformes: Scophthalmidae]. Cybium, 34(3): 257-261. Also FishBase --Ykvach (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Important why?
[edit]I have an issue with "It is an important food fish."... Okay, but why is it important? I read the rest of the article and still have no clue. I went to the reference, read the entire page, and did not find the answer there either. I can only assume that it can be considered important because it may be a popular fish to eat in some place of the world? Could someone who knows more insert a reason or provide a bit more context? Something like "It is an important food fish, because [insert reason here]."
- Start-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- Start-Class Food and drink articles
- High-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Start-Class Fishes articles
- High-importance Fishes articles
- WikiProject Fishes articles
- Start-Class Fishing articles
- Mid-importance Fishing articles
- WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing articles