Talk:Uberisation

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 March 2022. The result of the discussion was merge.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Uberisation[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you seem interested in the article Uberisation. I would really appreciate your help in improving the article, since you seem quite adept. This is an increasingly significant topic, and I think it's important to ensure at an early stage that its coverage on wikipedia is NPOV and of good quality. Thanks!!Hendrick 99 (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hendrick 99:As I already noted on your talk page, I don't see why this is different than sharing economy. And I don't really think the short article at uberisation has all that much to add. I think redirecting to sharing economy is the best option. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Gig worker#Uberisation]] The anchor (#Uberisation) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The above is transcluded from User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20160508 (2)

Too prominent[edit]

I was surprised to find this term as an established concept in business strategy. It's not very well established as a term, it's not substantially different from the sharing economy and it gives too much credit to one particular player in the sharing economy. Like others I suggest removal, at least from the list of major concepts in business strategy. Knotwilg (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Etymologically, it strikes me as similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonaldization Conceptually, I'd say it's merely a newfangled form of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploitation_of_labour Maybe those two articles should be linked as See Also references?

Netflix[edit]

How exactly does Netflix match this business model? In the old fashioned DVD world, I could have borrowed my buddy's DVD and watched, and an online service that matches people up would be the Uberisation of video. Netflix is literally the opposite - it's streaming service is actually designed to make this kind of sharing impossible. Netflix clearly doesn't belong on this list, and its inclusion amongst Uber and AirBnB will just confuse readers trying to understand this. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I support Netflix's removal. In what way are streaming services such as Apple Music and Netflix an example sharing economy/uberisation? They are centralised companies with traditional job structures, they are just digital retailers (aka business to consumer). Jonpatterns (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using definition from uberisation article to see if Netflix is an example:

The use of a digitalised platform enabling peer to peer, or quasi-peer to peer transactions

There is no peer-to-peer transaction, customers pay Netflix.

Minimising the distance between the provider and customer of a service

Netflix streams from central servers, or delivers via postal service.

The use of a rating system for the quality of the service provided by a provider.

There is only one service provider - Netflix.

So the question remains, in what way can Netflix be described as an example of uberisation. Jonpatterns (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonpatterns: True. In no way is Netflix a good example of 'uberisation'. I think it has been removed by now. Amin (Talk) 09:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the update, it has indeed been removed the article.Jonpatterns (talk) 10:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definition[edit]

Proposed definition:

"Uberisation is a business model where a company serves as a broker between individuals offering a service and their customers."

Unlike what's in the lead now, this is something I actually understand. It doesn't explicitly mention that the individuals are using personal property, or that they are not employees, though. We also need a separate definition for sharing economy so we can determine what goes in which article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The definition is fine, do you have any sources to back it up? Jonpatterns (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]