Talk:Uniform Gifts to Minors Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Poor quality[edit]

This is copied from Investopedia. It should be removed, or re-written.

  • More likely, Investopedia copied it from us. bd2412 T 15:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

This is terribly written and very biased. I don't know anything about wikipedia, but this needs to be tagged/changed by someone who does. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This is a really, really badly written page. The first part is iffy, but the latter part sounds like an editorial. It's almost worth deleting.-- (talk) 01:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

I have seen this article for the past several months and hated it for the reasons listed above. I always wanted to remove the offending material but for some reason until now I passed the opportunity. I removed the offending material and wikified the article in other articles. The article still needs a lot of work but at least now it's not like a tooth with a cavity. EECavazos (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Uniform Gifts to Minors Act/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class==

Stub class because one section. Needs more context and wiki links and references.EECavazos 04:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

==WP Tax Priority==

Low priority because esoteric while it applies to some states in one country.EECavazos 04:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 04:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)