Talk:United Sikkim FC

India: Sikkim Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sikkim (assessed as High-importance).

Football: India Start‑class Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

On 17 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from United Sikkim F.C. to United Sikkim FC. The result of the discussion was moved.

Should not be up for deletion

This page should not be deleted because this is a real club that plays in said league and country. Also the players on this club are notable Internationals with India. Arsenalkid700 (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2011 (EST)

Requested move 17 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and title consistency. FYI to nominator, this should have been done as one single RM discussion, with all the titles listed. But it's easier to just go ahead and do the moves now. (non-admin closure) — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 10:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

United Sikkim F.C. → United Sikkim FC – Consistency with current naming conventions in Category:Football clubs in India , Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. Footwiks (talk) 06:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - one of a mass number of nominations by this editor (at least 16 by my count?!) with no sources presented and no clear category convention to match. Giant Snowman 11:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that? Footwiks (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support for consistency. I was the one who actually moved a lot of these articles since Indian clubs en masse do not use the "." in FC, SC, AC etc. Most likely, the articles were titled like that due to original editors copying what is done with the Premier League. The Indian Super League itself doesn't add dots, and neither does the I-League. All other clubs have social media and some news coverage which never uses the dots. The Times of India doesn't use it, outlook india doesn't and even The Hindu does not include them. It's literally something that just does not exist in India or used besides on some wikipedia articles. Makes no sense to include. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.