Talk:Saint Joseph University of Beirut
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Université Saint-Joseph)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was Done. Discussion both opened and listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves for at least 5 days with no objections against the move. — Aitias // discussion 01:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Université Saint-Joseph → Saint Joseph University — WikiProject Universities' Article Guidelines and naming conventions suggest that article titles should be in English. Université Saint-Joseph's English Website says their English name is "Saint Joseph University" so a change makes sense. I propose that the Saint Joseph University article will no longer redirect to Saint Joseph's University but will link to it at the top of the article. — Noetic Sage 05:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Proposed amendments to the introduction
[edit]Naxh (talk) 10:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I wanted to take a moment to thank you both for your suggested modifications and your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I would appreciate it if we could discuss any changes before paragraphs that are well-written and well-sourced are deleted in bulk. Perhaps these could be moved to a different section if you both oppose their placement in the introduction? They are important and maintain a high standard of quality. Naxh (talk) 10:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @GuardianH, there seems to be some edit-warring going on here. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Melchior2006 It may be best if you and the editor might begin a separate discussion here. List out the material in the article's lede and/or body that is booster, and you might also want to consider adding Template:Academic booster to the top of the article in accordance with WP:BOOSTER and WP:HIGHEREDREP. GuardianH (talk) 17:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. I invited the editor to join the discussion, but he has not responded yet. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Melchior2006 It may be best if you and the editor might begin a separate discussion here. List out the material in the article's lede and/or body that is booster, and you might also want to consider adding Template:Academic booster to the top of the article in accordance with WP:BOOSTER and WP:HIGHEREDREP. GuardianH (talk) 17:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- @GuardianH, there seems to be some edit-warring going on here. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)