Talk:Unsinkable Sam

A fact from Unsinkable Sam appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 12,445 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Unsinkable Sam was a ship's cat of both the Kriegsmarine and Royal Navy during the Second World War who survived the sinking of all three ships on which he served?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/January.

Wikipedia

Military history: Maritime / British / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Cats C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clarification

Did really 159 of the Cossack men died?? It is a whole lot, especielly as it is about as many crew as destroyers had onboard. (+ sometimes a ship-cat). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.233.60.137 (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

159 fatalities is the number given by the HMS Cossack Association on their webpage, which also lists all 159. The ship's complement is given as 219, so yes, it was most of them. — BillC ^talk 19:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under the section for the HMS Ark Royal, it says that it was this ship in question "which ironically had been instrumental in the destruction of [the] Bismarck"

I'm curious how one English ship was involved in the destruction of another in this current time era. Any clarification is appreciated. Shint (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Bismarck was a German ship, as explained in the article (and indicated by her name).--129.70.14.129 (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, I feel really ashamed now. For some reason, because the Ark Royal was after the Cossack, I thought the article was referring to that ship instead of the Bismark. Nothing like being an idiot.

Shint (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bismark1040.jpg

The image Image:Bismark1040.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

On the "German Battleship Bismarck" talk page, I posted a note that this is an urban myth (albeit a great one, I have to say!) bigpad (talk) 11:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Purr-n-Fur site linked at the bottom of the page gives a number of solid reasons why the story of Unsinkable Sam is likely false. http://www.purr-n-fur.org.uk/featuring/war02.html#oscar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.218.69 (talk) 09:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was the creator of this article, and am inclined to concur -- there is increasing evidence that the story is merely an urban myth, albeit one that is reported as fact in a number of sources. Perhaps it is time to take it to WP:AFD —BillC ^talk 21:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties on Bismarck

This article says there were 115 survivors from the sinking of the Bismarck. The article on the Bismark says that 1995 of 2200 died (leaving 205 survivors). Anybody know which is correct?

Also, the specifications in that article (and elsewhere) give a crew complement of 2092, not 2200.T-bonham (talk) 08:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture?

What are the chanced that there is a picture of this cat? That would really increase teh coolness factor of this page.MilkStraw532 (talk) 22:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link at top to painting, at UK National Maritime Museum. Note comment: "The most famous and historical Cat in history." OK--Pete Tillman (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)....[reply]

Origin of legend

Do we know when this story was first written, published in a newspapaer or in a book? Was it created during the war or after it ended? --Andreas (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.hmscossack.org/memories.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]