Talk:Upper Mississippi River

Wisconsin High‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Distances between locks

Anyone have any info on the distances (along the waterway) between the locks? scot 22:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page on the River Industry Bulletin Board gives the mile location for each lock. -- Muffuletta 16:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I'm going to re-do the chart and include mile markers and maybe distances between locks. The COE also appears to have maps of the entire Mississippi river navigation system online at http://www2.mvr.usace.army.mil/NIC2/mrcharts.cfm. One more interesting thing I found, at http://www.tec.army.mil/echarts/inlandnav/ they have a nifty graphic that, being a military source should be public domain, that has the entire US inland navigation system outlined. Might be handy to grab a copy of that, trim it down to just the right half of the country, enlarge it, and create versions with different systems highlighted, like the Lower Mississippi, Upper Mississippi, Ohio, Kerr-McClellan, etc. scot 14:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Onalaska one of the more important lake in western Wisconsin part of upper Mississippi River

Hi! What about starting an article about Lake Onalaska in western Wisconsin? Lake Onalaska is part of the upper Mississippi River system and was created by the construction of Lock and Dam# 7 in the mid 1930s. Thank you- RFD (talk) 12:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basin area is wildly off

The area given for the basin (~3300 mi^2) is spectacularly wrong. Given that the upper section of the river itself is 1250 miles long (according to the article, anyway - perhaps that should be checked?) the basin would have to be about 3 miles wide. I can't find the original reference anywhere on the USGS website or on the web, but given that it refers to the UMR floodplain I suspect that the area given is for the floodplain, not the total drainage area. Trying to find a better primary reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandoliniment (talk • contribs) 18:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Upper Mississippi River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050403235059/http://friendsofuppermiss.org:80/pages/Refuges.html to http://www.friendsofuppermiss.org/pages/Refuges.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Upper Mississippi River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060426215119/http://www.agweb.com:80/get_article.asp?pageid=125697&src=gennews to http://www.agweb.com/get_article.asp?pageid=125697&src=gennews

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Mississippi River

This article defines the Upper Mississippi as the portion of the river as far as the Ohio confluence. The article on the Mississippi as a whole defines it as the portion as far as the Missouri confluence, and the portion between the Missouri and Ohio as the Middle Mississippi River. One of these must be changed so that they match, or at least the article should mention that there are competing definitions. Joe Avins (talk) 18:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Upper Mississippi River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.friendsofuppermiss.org/pages/Refuges.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703141148/http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc/factcard/fc05/factcard.pdf to http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc/factcard/fc05/factcard.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]