Talk:Uruguay Round Agreements Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled[edit]

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/Golan%20order_0.pdf

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6149

http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2009/04/05/public-domain-victory-in-golan-v-holder/

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090403/1619494384.shtml --Historiograf (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Ever or never?[edit]

Resolved

Hi! The article says

  • Excepted from the copyright restorations are only foreign works where the copyright was never owned or administered by the "Alien Property Custodian," if (...)

But the 17 USC 104A(a)(2) says [1]:

  • EXCEPTION Any work in which the copyright was ever owned or administered by the Alien Property Custodian (...)

I'm not a native English speaker, but it seems it's the exact opposite, no? --GaAs (d) 12:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you're correct. I see you went ahead and made the fix on the same day you commented. Thanks! —mjb (talk) 04:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Films previously in the public domain[edit]

Is this section an exhaustive list, or just the most notable films? —mjb (talk) 03:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

It is incomplete. For example, see this court case where someone was fined for violating the copyright of 62 Mexican films which were previously in the public domain in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Expired copyright[edit]

"Also affected are works which did have previous U.S. copyright, but which entered the public domain due to a failure to renew the copyright."

According to paragraph 1 of Article 18 the convention applies to works still under copyright in the country of origin.

Paragraph 2 states that if copyright has expired where it is claimed (in this case, presumably the US), it is not restored. This appears to conflict with URAA if the article is correct.

Paragraph 3 mentions "provisions contained special conventions". Are there any that would cause URAA not to conflict with the convention? Peter James (talk) 10:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)