Talk:Vala, or The Four Zoas

A fact from Vala, or The Four Zoas appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in William Blake's Four Zoas myth, the Christian God is divided into four parts, Sense, Reason, Imagination, and Love, which have the counterparts Sexual Urges, Pleasure, Inspiration, and Nature?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

Wikipedia

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry: William Blake Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by William Blake task force (assessed as High-importance).

Engraved or unengraved?

The lead paragraph states that Blake never produced an engraved version of this poem; however, the third paragraph states that he did engrave it, comparing the size of this engraving to his earlier Europe a Prophecy. Is this simply an oversight? (FWIW, if I remember Keynes' notes to his edition of Blake correctly, I believe this work was never engraved or published.) -- llywrch (talk) 17:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are engravings of pages, and sketches of others. The work was never fully published or completed. It was scrapped and parts of it were reused in Jerusalem. Does that help? Ottava Rima (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then the lead paragraph ought to conclude, "Blake intended the book to be a summation of his mythic universe but dissatisfied with the work he abandoned the effort in 1807, leaving the poem in a rough draft and its engraving unfinished." -- llywrch (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. -- llywrch (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]