Talk:Van Gend & Loos
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Van Gend & Loos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ECJ ruling
[edit]I can't believe that this page doesn't mention (except for the link on the top, which one easily misses) the landmark European Court of Justice ruling of 1963 which was triggered by an action brought by van Gend and laid the foundations for what is now the European Union. Shouldn't it be added to the body of the article? 163.1.51.71 (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Diligence
[edit]I tried to find out what a "diligence company" is, and discovered that Wikipedia's disambiguation page on diligence refers to Dutch windmills, which is obviously not what it means on this page. That's as far as I got. What is it? Does anybody know? Unfree (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- Company articles needing attention
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Transport articles
- Low-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles