Talk:Vanessa Gonçalves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OTT[edit]

Wow; does anyone else think this is way over the top for an encyclopaedia entry?The joy of all things (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

This article is too flowery without citations and reference. I will try to clean up later, but if somebody wants to help out.....? The joy of all things (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@The joy of all things: What exactly isn't neutral about the lead of the article? ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:55, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blaze The Wolf, five years ago (wow) the lead said this:
It's been tidied up a lot since then. Feel free to remove the tag. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright will do. And just reading the first line of that tells me it really need cleaned up per WP:NPOV. Thanks for letting me know! ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In an unrelated matter; it still says in the lead that she is a dentist, but not in the article. I looked sometime ago, but couldn't find a cite. Fully prepared to accept she is that, but I think that'll need either a cite, or removing. Thoughts? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 18:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really think her being a dentist is something that we should mention anyway as it isn't really what she's known for. Although I would definitely say that if you can't find a source that says she's a dentist then you should remove it. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
At the very top of the talk page it says (and I"m paraphrasing) that any content that could probably be challenged and is unsourced should be removed immediately. And there's some stuff in the (small) main body of the article that is unsourced and should either be sourced or removed. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]