Jump to content

Talk:Vernon Treatt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleVernon Treatt has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 1, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vernon Treatt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grahame (talk) 02:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is clearly a Good Article

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: