Talk:Victorian gold rush

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Victoria / History Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Victorian gold rush is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Develop content about the rushes within Victoria

I thought insteead of putting work in slow progress into the article page, I would put it here instead while I gathered info--A Y Arktos\^talk 12:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ballarat

Balla arat -> Ballarat, Victoria

Year	Ounces
1853	319,099 oz
1854	584,957 oz
1855	769,429 oz
1856	920,351 oz
1857	686,236 oz
1858	502,984 oz
1859	467,233 oz
1860	267,288 oz
1861	244,631 oz

from [1]

meanie

you guys are so mean you cept the other persons topic but ot mine so good riddince to you toyou, you you what everyou are so there :-( so wat if it has nothing to do with the topic!

humph humph humph

your worst enimy

Link to the Eureka Rebellion

Should we provide a link from this page to the article about the Eureka Rebellion? I think we should because of it's importance in the period. Yvg09 (talk) 03:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We already do, in the "Backfiring Guns " section. Graham87 08:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And now it's the "Background" section, thanks to this edit to fix some vandalism. Graham87 08:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Text about Phillip Blashki

I've removed the text about Phillip Blashki because it's far more relevant in his article. We don't need to mention how one particular person made use of the gold from the Victorian gold rush, especially in the background section. Graham87 06:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External link added

I moderate the Culture Victoria website and have added an external link to photographs documenting the Victorian Goldrush from the State Library of Victoria's collection.--Eleworth (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly inaccurate figure

It's stated that Britain received 500,000 million pounds as a result of the gold rush - this is the same as saying that that they received 500 billion pounds. Could it be clarified whether or not this is a figure adjusted to reflect current currency values. I checked the reference article for this point and came up empty handed.

Regards,

Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.123.102 (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I've removed the figure for now. Graham87 07:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]