|WikiProject Magazines||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Ireland||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
Merge and keep name 'Village (magazine)' - Monucg 12:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- As above. ant_ie 19:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:MagazineVillageIrelandthumbnail.jpg
Image:MagazineVillageIrelandthumbnail.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Biasness and smear attack by person who wrote main article
God i've not seen such a biased article since the last time i read libellous comment about a newspaper. Alot of the stuff needs to be cited. it does not suffice to say something was in Phoenix magazine. how about the publication date or the issue number of the phoenix magazine that the claim is made in. Also from what i recall, the village magazine did issue an apology for the article about mary wallace however it stuck to their claim that she hardly took part in discussions in the dail if my memory serves me right. however i do not have a citation so i will not change the uncited article with just a random link to a blog site. further more, i thought it was owned by a group of investors. alot of the information was out of date so i deleted this nonsense. i went very trigger happy on the citations needed iu will admit but i needed to. this page has basically been used as a smear attack on village magazine.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Village (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090521192122/http://villagemagazine.wordpress.com:80/2008/11/26/village-cover-december-08/ to http://villagemagazine.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/village-cover-december-08/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.