Talk:Violaceae
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge proposal
[edit]I do not see the need for having two articles - the "Violaceae" is merely a stub with a taxobox, and the "Taxonomy ..." is a two-screen list. Putting all the information in one place would only be of help to the reader. It is not a genus or species article, so its main value is exactly from the botancal point of view. -- Goldie (tell me) 18:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agree 100% - MPF 10:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Stub page
[edit]The taxonomy is unreferenced and is not the only one available. Link is dead. Andyboorman (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Violaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107142255/http://www.chileflora.com/Florachilena/FloraEnglish/PIC_FAMILIES_SIMPLE_148.php to http://www.chileflora.com/Florachilena/FloraEnglish/PIC_FAMILIES_SIMPLE_148.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)