Talk:Vision Brisbane

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Vision Brisbane is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Untitled

when vision is completed it will be australias 4th tallest tower starting in july 2006 possible complition in late 2008 vision tower is not the only tower in brisbane going up to join the skyline there is emerald toers which was cancelled because of the hieght. vision will reach 285 meters almost 300 meters tall it is 270 meters to the top roof.Emerald will should be 250meters maybe higher there is no way that it will be 230 meters because u have roughly 3.5 m of 1 floor ground floor not incuded. i worked out that emerald will be almost 255 meters tall just beyond vision. Also there is auroa standing at 219 meters tall 69 stories i think personly there should be way more skyscrapers built in brisbane. The population of brisbane is 1.8 million and we have the fastest growing city in Australia by 2020 there will be 4 million people it takes at least 2 to 5 years for a big skyscraper. Melbourne and sydney are all the talk with there tall skyscrapers and population brisbane is write behind and there is still no tall building other then the ones there making.Why doesn't brisbane have as many buildings as melbourne or sydney? There should be more taller skyscrapers in brisbane that are like 70 stories 90 stories and like 300 390 meters. Also there should be more office buildings and more resdential maybe even like a observation tower such as centerpiont sydney well here are some piture of australias skyscraper

Vis talk

Hey, interesting opinion there... A lot of it I agree with you. Just a heads up for next time, you may want to use spell check.

Fair use rationale for Image:Vision3zm-1.jpg

Image:Vision3zm-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]