Talk:W. C. Bradley Co.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The only source for this page is the Company website. This page should be merged with William C. Bradley page. Please move or delete. It is overly promotional.[edit]

Untitled[edit]

How is this advertising? This is just like any other company's page. This page is similar to General Electric should it be marked as an advertisement and deleted? I don't understand your logic. Bryanw03 04:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wcbradleycologo191.png[edit]

Image:Wcbradleycologo191.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fair use rationale has been added to image. Steevo714 (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of company founding?[edit]

The company's own website proclaims (on its Home Page) that the company was founded in 1885 (as does our Wikipedia page). However, that was the year when the first Bradley arrived in town and began working for a cotton-factoring enterprise. In 1887 he "marries Sarah M. Hall, daughter of the famous Connecticut ship builder, Henry T. Hall. Shortly after, he and his brother-in-law Samuel A. Carter purchase the cotton factoring business, changing the name to Carter and Bradley." (from the company's website, History Page). It seems to me that THE COMPANY was not founded until 1887 or later, according to the company's own history page, even though the founder began working in the industry in 1885. Any suggestions on how to address this discrepancy?--Raymondwinn (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.coca-colacompany.com/history/the-chronicle-of-coca-cola-a-man-named-woodruff. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]