Talk:WWE Music Group

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE Music Group article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	WWE Music Group is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volume 4 artists

WWF: The Music, Vol. 4 does not include Rage against the Machine, Mariah Carey, or Lil' Wayne. The MTV source used say that these artists released albums the same week as WWF: The Music, Wol. 4

WWF: The Music, Vol. 4 actually had the largest-selling debut week of all the tie-ins, notching 214,000 copies out of the gate. But the monster 1-2-3 debuts by Rage Against the Machine's The Battle of Los Angeles, Mariah Carey's Rainbow and Lil' Wayne's Tha Block Is Hot were enough to keep Vol. 4 at #4 during its debut week. Despite spending just two weeks in the top 20, WWF: The Music, Vol. 4 has sold more than 1.13 million copies.

Hope this clears everything up. Cuckfena31 (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. When removing sourced information, you need to clarify why in the edit summary...otherwise, it looks like vandalism. I do, however, agree with you now. Nikki311 21:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Other digital music services"

Under the single releases it says iTunes and other digital music services. As there is no citation given, what are these other services? Because I have only found these tracks on iTunes, so either some citation (or more information) is needed or it is incorrect.

Yup, you seem to be right. I'll amend it now (as I'm pretty sure it was me who wrote it originally) IanPCP (talk) 21:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wade Barrett/The Corre

Someone made an edit to change the Wade Barrett theme back to The Corre, which I've had to undo as this is incorrect. The theme is on iTunes as being Wade Barrett's theme (with Wade-related artwork) but was originally released on iTunes as The Corre's theme; hence the note about this theme being "originally attributed to The Corre". I believe this is the best way to list themes where WWE has made a change to the art/wrestler for the theme (see also: Otunga/McGillicutty). If you've got any other ideas/comments, please say so here :) Cheers IanPCP (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Singles

Why was the singles releases table removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6:7480:88C:D86C:1636:9686:1161 (talk) 01:47, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhhh.....can someone put the singles back up please. It should not have been taken down! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.33.230 (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed yet again as per WP:IINFO. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can quote policy all you want Bill, but that isn't "discussing" anything. Forget that policy exists and discuss your reasoning why you are removing content that had been there for YEARS. ArcAngel (talk) ) 17:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning is that the policy does actually exist, ergo I removed the violating material. It doesn't matter if it was there for years, several millennia or seven minutes, that is irrelevant. As it was irrelevant when I got the Brimstone article deleted. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Since you have shown tendencies of lawyering, I'll go ahead and make it its own article if that will make you happy. ArcAngel (talk) ) 19:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

@Pokkeballs17, Bram Geukens, Thatprowrestlingnovaig, and TheVaughano: I propose to merge WWE Music Group discography into WWE Music Group, as per a discussion I had at Talk:WWE Music Group discography. The WWE Music Group article is of a reasonable size that the merging of WWE Music Group discography will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. ItsKesha (talk) 00:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since no one objects, proposer ItsKesha should consider doing a BOLD merge. GenQuest ^"scribble" 12:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is WWE Music Group LLC still around?

From a company sense, is the LLC or even the INC still around? I can't find it in any SEC filings 2021 onwards as an active subsidiary of WWE, Inc. Recent distributed music are all credited by WWE, Inc as a label, not WWE Music Group or other names of this company.

Proposal when there are lacking sources of this being a company, to instead write the article as a division of WWE, since WWE Music is an active division of the company located in New York.

Afrique0512 (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]