Talk:WWE Music Group discography

Walk with Elias is not a Compilation albums by WWE Music Group it is a Single-artist albums by WWE Music Group please correct it!

WWE: Uncaged VIII Link

Someone has removed the link to WWE Uncaged VIII. Can it please be fixed. No reaon for it to be removed sinc te album has already been released.

WWE: UNCAGED IX

Can someone plesae update the page to include WWE Uncaged IX, which was released last week? https://www.amazon.co.uk/WWE-Uncaged-IX-Jim-Johnston/dp/B07W8T617Y — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.80.152 (talk) 23:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Def Rebel / Miz & Morrison

@Thatprowrestlingnovaig: do you have a reliable source for Def Rebel being the artist for the Miz & Morrison song? Additionally, the iTunes/etc releases make NO mention of Def Rebel/DJDTP/Doug Davis/etc; even in the metadata. IanPCP (talk) 13:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

that’s why i put it there for a reason. https://heelbynature.com/wrestling-news/wwe-news/wwe-music-group-to-use-def-rebel-as-new-production-name/ Thatprowrestlingnovaig (talk) 10:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Even if Def Rebel did write and produce "Hey Hey", it was still released with the artist as "Miz & Morrison". I believe Jim Johnston produced "So Close Now", with David Dallas providing vocals, but it was released under the artist name of "David Dallas" and NOT "Jim Johnston" so it goes in the "by others" section as this very page specifies: "These themes feature other artists as the main artist rather than Jim Johnston, CFO$, or Jimmy Hart & JJ Maguire.". Also, heelbynature.com isn't listed as a reliable source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Sources IanPCP (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Issues with article

There is an awful lot of information on here that doesn't have valid references, such as featured artists. Additionally, the latest additions (anything from Def Rebel) has the dates of when the videos were added to Youtube - as well as the Youtube URL as the reference - when the actual release date should be the date the song was released to Spotify, Apple Music, etc. IanPCP (talk) 13:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

removal of content

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey, ItsKesha, I'm not sure removing the entire discography is the answer here? A discography is a fairly common type of article for musical groups. The fact it's sourced to iTunes is a problem, so we'd remove those links, but the fact something is then unsourced is just something that needs to be fixed. We wouldn't normally remove something for not having a source unless it was a dubious assertion. —valereee (talk) 16:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Valereee:, thanks for the question. WWE Music Group is a record label as opposed to an artist. So the question becomes: is a record label putting their songs on iTunes and Spotify the same as releasing singles? And is there even any precedent for a record label having a full list of songs on a discography page like this? Let's have a look: Columbia Records has no discography page. Parlophone has no discography page. Roc Nation has a singles discography page that only lists charting singles (WWE has had one single chart, ever). The Interscope Records discography only has albums. Def Jam, albums only. Geffen, albums only. Hollywood Records, albums only. Aftermath only has a subsection on its page which lists albums. Death Row, charting singles. Fearless Records, albums only. Fueled by Ramen, albums only. And let's be honest, it would be a huge stretch, and a huge insult too for that matter, to compare some wrestling theme on Spotify and iTunes to Motown or Factory. ItsKesha (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

ItsKesha, so is the answer actually to merge the article somewhere? Sorry, I don't know much about music articles so can't address your arguments. Pinging Ritchie333 who does a lot of work on music. —valereee (talk) 18:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee: I think the fact that the WWE Music Group article in itself is not too long (currently not even 20k bytes in size) leads me to believe a merge is probably for the best. The sourcing as it stands is obviously an issue for the time being, but at the very least it's no longer just a list of basically every wrestling song of the last 20 years with iTunes links. ItsKesha (talk) 19:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

ItsKesha, I'd suggest proposing a merge. Info is at WP:MERGEPROP. I don't think you should just be bold because it's possible Dilbaggg would have a valid objection, but I think proposing it would be fine. —valereee (talk) 19:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

This is bullcrap, ItsKesha! I have a playlist in iTunes of WWE themes & use(d) this all the time to know what to look for to add to my collection! What you fail to realize is that WWE Music Group is not like Columbia Records (which is an actual record label) or Parlophone or Roc Nation. What it (actually) is, is a division of WWE that produces their own music (in house, such as CFO$, that are contracted to do that) but sometimes use outside artists to perform the vocals on/in the songs but not a true record label in the way that you describe. That section that you removed is no different than going to Taylor Swift’s Discography to see a listing of (all) her albums, songs, etc. So by (completely) removing that section, what is there to find such a listing of songs? Furthermore, there is/was (never) a listing of songs by actual artists like Edge using Alter Bridge’s Metalings or Living Colour’s Cult of Personality (song) that was used by CM Punk (which I believe there should be, as well)….both of which I only found (back) when all themes used by wrestlers were listed on their own pages - which was (all) removed in the same way that you had done with this situation. What am I suppose to do now when that section is/was the best/only way to look for songs without having to randomly enter names (in iTunes) to search for with (usually) no results? Therefore, it is a total disgrace that you removed this section & must be restored so that there is a listing of such songs that there is no other way to find! 2600:1702:3860:D290:75CE:43DA:C80B:12B7 (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a repository of ALL INFORMATION EVER. As unfortunate as it is that you're no longer able to have a convenient list of WWE iTunes releases, that isn't Wikipedia's job. IanPCP (talk) 10:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Where else is is there? There needs to be SOMEPLACE to be able to find it! What you clearly don't understand is that for years (as long as I can remember) Wikipedia was & has been the ONLY place to find that stuff & now its becoming COMPLETRELY USELESS for such things! It seem like EVERY SINGLE THING that I have EVER gone/come to Wikipedia for is nonexistent anymore! Yet every so often (just recently, too, BTW) Wikipedia has campaigns asking people for donations to support the site! Why would I (or anybody else, for that matter) pay to support a site that COMPLETRLY STOPS POSTING what I/they use the site for? What logical sense does that actually make? If Wikipedia wants donations from people than they need to KEEP POSTING what people come here for! This just goes to show how COMPLETRELY USELESS Wikipedia is becoming! My money is CLRARLY better spent elsewhere & I will NEVER donate to Wikipedia EVER AGAIN when they KEEP TAKING AWAY what I come here for! So how about telling me something that actually makes sense? 2600:1702:3860:D290:E1E4:EBA6:4441:65CB (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Taylor Swift is a singer, not a music label. Most reputable singers have a separate discography page. Does her music label list her entire discography on its page, or just albums? I have demonstrated in the comment above that no music label, bar two incredible cases, has a discography page which contains entire lists of songs. Alter Bridge and Living Colour aren't signed to the WWE music label, but if they were then their albums would be mentioned on the page. As is the case for the band Neurotica. If CFOS released an album, it would be listed. If he has had a single in the charts, it can be listed. "I need a list for my playlist"; good for you mate! If you want to make an argument that wrestling themes should be included in a wrestlers infobox, I'd actually back you up on that as there is precedence for it. But I'm sorry, there's nothing special about a wrestler having an entrance song, so a list of wrestling songs is just nonsense. ItsKesha (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia asks everyone for donations. It is a choice you can make. If you want to donate, then do. If you don't, then don't. There is nothing making you donate anything. As for your question "why would I pay to support a site that completely stops posting what I use the site for", I doubt anyone would expect you to. There are MANY people who do find what they want on Wikipedia and are very happy to support it financially. It isn't just about you. Back to the matter at hand though; Wikipedia simply cannot be a collection of all information, and there has to be limits on what is - and isn't - deemed worthy of being on Wikipedia. It's probably worth having a read through WP:Notability (music). IanPCP (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Things like this - i.e. a massive list of singles - are best served on www.discogs.com. As with Wikipedia, it requires users to submit data though and, unfortunately, the WWE Music Group page is woefully out of date. IanPCP (talk) 14:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

ItsKesha: I don’t know why you are asking me about the Taylor Swift page & not finding it yourself….that just sems lazy to me but whatever the case, not only is there the bio page (for lack of a better word) but an ENTIRE page (not sub-sections) of Taylor Swift albums discography (Studio albums, Live albums, Compilation albums & Extended plays) with the former 2 having induvial links/pages to each album), Taylor Swift singles discography (including “As lead artist” -with sub-sections by year 2000s, 2010s & 2020s with links to pages for each song & album & even a "Non-album single" is listed under 2010s), “As featured artist”, “Promotional singles” - with "Non-album promotional single" listed twice & “Other charted songs”) & List of songs recorded by Taylor Swift which doesn’t make any sense to me & haven’t seen for any other artist (so that should be removed more then the WWE songs)! How is it that Taylor Swift’s or any other artist’s (listing of) singles more important then the WWE songs to get/be listed? Moreover, why do songs have to be “charted” to be relevant? Therefore, your logic for removing them does not compute with why it is fine for other songs that fit the same description to be listed bot the WWE songs can’t be listed. I don’t believe you can justify the logic behind that conflicting way of thinking. That being said, there IS a reason for the WWE listing(s) to be restored. Additionally, you say/claim “If you want to make an argument that wrestling themes should be included in a wrestlers infobox, I'd actually back you up on that as there is precedence for it.” but that couldn’t be farther from the truth! As I had said previously, they HAD previously listed in a former “In Wrestling” section that included holds used, finishers, past/current managers, past/current themes but they were all removed a long time ago & “Championships and accomplishments” is all that remains! When I complained about that (in much the same way I am here), I was completely shut down (in much the same way I have been here) & directed to Pro Wrestling Wiki but that is not reliable as that is completely out-of-date (which I had indicated at that time to no success & you were nowhere around to “back me up” then so I’ll believe that when I see it! Additionally, there were songs listed (that you removed) that never even made it to the Wiki at all….thereby making the section on Wikipedia (that you took it upon yourself to remove) way more reliable the Pro Wrestling Wiki ever was! Yet, thanks to you, there is no listing whatsoever!

I'll tell you again, Taylor Swift is an artist (like everybody categorised here Category:Lists_of_songs_recorded_by_reocrding_artists). This is common practice, and I don't know why you have tried to claim it isn't, I really don't! However, as you have already been told, WWE Music Group isn't a music artist, it's a music label. The discographies of music labels simply don't have lists of songs on them, as I have clearly demonstrated above. And I'm not talking about an "in wrestling" section (which sounds like it was rightfully deleted), I'm talking about the infobox. ItsKesha (talk) 19:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Everything you say contradicts what you kept! WWE Music Group wasn’t founded until 2003 (par the InfoBox) yet you kept Compilation albums prior to that! Yet you remove every single release (some of which was previously released on actual albums! Your logic makes as much sense as a snowman in summer…. 2600:1702:3860:D290:E1E4:EBA6:4441:65CB (talk) 20:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

I've not contradicted anything, as I didn't actually know that information. But now you have let me know about it, it can be easily removed from the page. Good work, Mr Numbers. ItsKesha (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

IanPCP: I did look at that article but I thought much of it was confusing so I got nothing out of it. What I did notice & stuck out to me, however, is under “Albums” it says “An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist or ensemble to merit a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.” & under “Singles” it says “A single requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That a single is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Even if otherwise notable, material about a single may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.” which is (both) basically pretty much the same. Also, under “Songs” it says “Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label.” So how are the songs that were listed - but removed - not “an officially released recording” or “notable”? Just because they were/are singles & not part of an album doesn’t make sense to me. They were never “standalone articles” so them “not by itself reason for a standalone article” is irrelevant as they did not have separate pages but rather just a sub-section of the main article (which is still there but highly edited with hardly anything on rendering it pointless the way it is now). As far as what you say about Discogs, what good is that if/when it is so out dated? (As well as the Pro Wrestling Wiki I indicate above that fits the same out-of-date classification.) At least the listing(s) that were removed from the Wikipedia article had (recent) listings through 2020 & as recently as August that I had seen….but have absolutely no way whatsoever of knowing if anything had been listed since I had last looked in early-December as I just recently discovered 2 days ago it gone! But what (up-to-date) listing exists now? I think that is a legitimately fair question that everyone here refuses to answer but deserves a worthy answer - that, in itself, is a problem that nobody can give an answer that fairly justifies the removal!

Point being, I don’t see how that listing is not worthy of being on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia is “the free encyclopedia” (which I see at the top of every page, BTW) then what is it an “encyclopedia” of when it seem like - according to what I come to Wikipedia for, anyway - more stuff is removed then added? I’m not saying there isn’t a need/reason to reorganize &/or better manage it but it shouldn’t be (completely) removed the was it had been! 2600:1702:3860:D290:E1E4:EBA6:4441:65CB (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

IP, FWIW, if you want you can go get that information from the article history. —valereee (talk) 22:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee:: Hum, what good does that do when it’s old? Clearly you miss my point….if I go there now it may have stuff from 4 weeks ago but what if I went there 2 months from now? If I go there in February it wouldn’t list anything that may have been released in January, would it? It would only have what was there PRIOR TO it being removed (as it clearly says at the top, “This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 65.95.94.73 (talk) at 02:00, 7 December 2020 (→‎Compilation albums by WWE Music Group). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.”) so that DOES NOT override my point! What do I care about the article HISTORY when I’d want to look for RECENT additions? What part of that is so hard for you do comprehend? 2600:1702:3860:D290:E1E4:EBA6:4441:65CB (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Lol, pretty sure I'm being trolled here but I've had a glass of wine so it's kind of fun? IP, I guess you'd have to actually do the updating yourself? Sorry, the complete directory of WWE tunes isn't something I'm interested in. Maybe you could offer to create that for some fan site. The point is that WP isn't a directory. We're an encyclopedia. —valereee (talk) 01:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

My left nut.... 2600:1702:3860:D290:E1E4:EBA6:4441:65CB (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

You people clearly don’t know anything whatsoever about wrestling & what music means to it & more specifically the personalities that use it! Like the saying goes, “For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.” yet you take that away from those that do! Just because something is irrelevant to you doesn’t mean its not relevant to somebody else! So who are you to decide what is or isn’t relevant or irrelevant? The simple fact of the matter is that ItsKesha has ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to take it upon herself & declare it irrelevant! 2600:1702:3860:D290:3853:A299:335A:138A (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I have every right to make the changes I did, because I have actually read the necessary policies. Cry more. ItsKesha (talk) 14:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Whatever! You clearly have absolutely no idea whatsoever what I'm talking about! If you did you wouldn't have done that! Shows what you know about wrestling (trust me, I know, I've been in it).... 2600:1702:3860:D290:3853:A299:335A:138A (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Wrestling is full of nonces, racists and rapists, I wouldn't go around bragging about being in wrestling. Now, have you got any Wikipedia policies to show me to back up your argument? ItsKesha (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

ItsKesha, that's beyond the pale. Please strike it. —valereee (talk) 17:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

I cite Music in professional wrestling. Please tell me, EXACTLY, How is that not relevant? 2600:1702:3860:D290:3853:A299:335A:138A (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Please take this to one or the other of your user talk pages. It's disruptive here. —valereee (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.