Talk:Wales and Borders

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name and company name

Other than the logo in the infobox, everything seems to refer to this franchise as being "Wales & Borders" (i.e. using the ampersand not "and"), including the archived copy of the introduction from the webpage. If this didn't change, I propose to move the article to Wales & Borders (currently a redirect here).

Secondly, the first reference is to the Companies House return for "Cardiff Railway Company" with no mention of "Wales and Borders" (or "Wales & Borders") there. This is the identical return linked at Valley Lines. If the Valley Lines company was the one that became this franchise then it needs some explanation in the text. Thryduulf (talk) 13:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had thought the MOS offered guidance on ampersands in article titles but apparently not. If that's the name used in official documents then I've no objection. Mackensen (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I hadn't thought to look, but MOS:AMPERSAND says they should not generally be used in titles or running text, but "Retain an ampersand when it is a legitimate part of a proper noun, such as in Up & Down or AT&T." I moved Wales and West to Wales & West without discussion earlier, as it is clear that that was the official and common name (e.g. the company's legal name used the ampersand). In this case only most things use the ampersand and the legal name of the company was apparently completely different ("Cardiff Railway Company"), hence the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 14:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]