Talk:Walter Rauschenbusch

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Christianity: Theology / Anglicanism / Baptist Top‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Baptist work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

References and footnotes

This article is great - I especially love the quotes. Would be great if someone could reference the quotes with proper footnotes.

If anyone has the time to expand this article, I think that would be good too.

Davymast 11:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biography

Biography also needs inserting/expanding.

Davymast 11:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Critique

And who the heck wrote the Critique section? It's not appropriate to insert a critique of one's own here. Rather, one should indicate how Rauschenbusch and the Social Gospel movement were critiqued by their contemporaries and by modern theologians, making certain to make relevant citations.

"But the Social Gospel advocates were not interested in expanding Christian love; they were interested in an equality of ends." That's quite a remarkable statement. One certainly well placed in a college or grad school critique, wherein such positions may be sourced and defended. But Wikipedia is meant to be considerably more objective.

--Vhiucgtoor (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Vhiucgtoor; the critique section is obviously a personal critique of Rauschenbusch that I think we should cut in its entirety. The only serious critics mentioned are Reinhold Niebuhr (whose cited critique is vague) and James Fowler (whose work as a developmental psychologist is probably valuable, but who shouldn't be cited in an encyclopedia for his critique of Rauschenbusch). A critiques section would be a valuable addition to this page, but they should, as Vhiucgtoor says, be characterizing the critiques of his contemporaries and important later interpreters. I'm cutting it for now, as clear editorializing. If someone disagrees, feel free to restore and list the page as having a neutrality dispute. -- Brian Hamilton 18:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdhamilton (talk • contribs)

Influence

Any idea what the meaning of the phrase "the herpderp" in the Influence section is supposed to signify? A quick web search did not enlighten me. It seems to me that it could be replaced by "his." Raorllud (talk) 01:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]