Talk:We the Kings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fair use rationale for Image:WetheKingslow.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:WetheKingslow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Alli[edit]

Alli is not a member just doing one thing, playing keyboard for one time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.8.88 (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


Note[edit]

I don't have this on my watchlist anymore; tired of babysitting. I hope someone else does. Chubbles (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Help Needed[edit]

Coding at the bottom of the page needs fixed. [blondie always in trouble] - 28th June 2009

Old EPs[edit]

What happened to their old self-released EPs? Not sure who removed it, but they did exist... ~DoubleAW[c] 03:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Associated Acts[edit]

What does this heading entail exactly, is it just for the contempories or for bands they've shared members with etc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.105.151 (talk) 22:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


Controversy[edit]

I think this section is rather confusing and of little relevance. The only person involved in the "controversy" was the tour manager for We The Kings. It is not a controversy about the band, or about any police acts against the band members themselves. It would make more sense to simply state that tour manager Trevor Fair was allegedly beaten by Philadelphia police in an incident after a show and point to a page where further explanation would be more relevant, such as Mercy Mercedes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.110.135 (talk) 16:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

I completely agree. The controversy section ought to be removed as irrelevant.--70.91.82.131 (talk) 18:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Watson.briant, 2 July 2010[edit]

{{editsemiprotected}}

The "We the Kings" page does not have the band's official website listed anywhere. I feel it should be. http://wethekingsmusic.com/

Watson.briant (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Done -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 01:11, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Autograph Charges?[edit]

I can't find anything about them charging for autographs on Google, should be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.231.59 (talk) 22:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Live DVD[edit]

The live DVD that was filmed in Bradenton, FLA, December 2010 is not mentioned anywhere in the article, though it still hasn't been released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.33.62.249 (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:We the kings.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg

An image used in this article, File:We the kings.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

New album "Somewhere Somehow"[edit]

We The Kings recently released a new album called "Somewhere Somehow". They are #2 on top charts on iTunes if this information helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.209.204.238 (talk) 22:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

iTunes charts are not used per WP:SINGLEVENDOR, charting will be taken from Billboard following the end of its sales week. STATic message me! 23:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot to sign last comment - was on my phone. Anyways the article is protected so the first paragraph says their latest release is Sunshine State of Mind released in 2011 so that needs to be corrected. Thanks for the heads up man, I wasn't aware there was a policy on iTunes charts. --Brenr (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem, and I copy edited it. You should have seen how IPs have been editing the page, I like the band too, but they have a snowballs chance in hell of debuting at number 1 on the Billboard 200 with a indie album (that is the vandalism that kept taking place). STATic message me! 03:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Say You Like Me[edit]

According to Travis Clark's vlog (possibly Charles' and Danny's), you can clearly see that Say You Like Me received platinum status on their plaques. Is citing a vlog or vlogs proof enough to change it? I ask because the ARIA site does not show it as platinum only gold. Paul Wooton (talk) 02:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)