Talk:Word list

A fact from Word list appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Edward Thorndike and company counted 18,000,000 words by hand to create the first English language words frequency list of its size?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/October.

Wikipedia

Lists Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

[comment copied from Talk:Frequency list after merge]

Maybe the correct form "outrageous" would be more relevant to be included than "outragious." (I guess the present figure refers to the misspelled form, isn't it?) Adam78 13:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[comment copied from Talk:Frequency list after merge]

Could someone create a frequency list of the words occuring in the Wikipedia? -- Sloyment (talk) 07:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service lists

French

Spanish

http://www.spanishpronto.com/spanishpronto/spanishvocab.html

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yug (talk • contribs) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

English

http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.22.218.36 (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[comment copied from Talk:Frequency list after merge]

"Frequency lists are a necessary prerequisite for building of an electronic dictionary" - hardly. You can build one in many ways without frequency lists. The sentence is poor English anyway (if something is a prerequisite, then by definition it is necessary). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.236.94 (talk) 06:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

transducionalify?

wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.61.20 (talk) 22:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Word lists by frequency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100704172738/http://pedagogie.ac-amiens.fr:80/casnav/accueillir/fle_fls/didactique/francais_fondamental.htm to http://pedagogie.ac-amiens.fr/casnav/accueillir/fle_fls/didactique/francais_fondamental.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please make this easier to use

I assume that most people come to this page looking for links to word frequency lists, not for a huge discussion of such lists. There should be a front section giving links for the major languages, leaving the discussion of such lists (which most people don't actually come here looking for) to later sections.

2601:184:497F:8D29:4C45:6105:30EB:8FA7 (talk) 04:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

First, wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, whom's mission is to explain things. So the article should focus on explaining more these studies and impacts.

Secondly, yes, we still can provide pointers (links) to results, aka raw data or word list. There is now a few solid key studies : worldlex, unilex, which provide dozens of lists.

So yes, every volunteers around is encouraged to improve this article in these 2 aspects, and in any given way deemed suitable (style, other scientific findings, etc). Yug (talk) 12:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]