This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
I don't think that this page is significant enough to have its own article, it should just be as it is as a section in Lemon and Paeroa. 125.238.249.40 (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As explained on the page, though this phrase was first popularised by the L&P ads, its use is far more widespread than that promotion. I'd say it definitely deserves its own page. Grutness...wha? 01:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rubbish. It's an L&P tagline, pure and simple. Just because it gets repeated ocasionally doesn't change that. No way this is notable enough for its own article. ElectricRay (talk) 12:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
