Talk:Yugoslav Social-Democratic Party

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 35 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Untitled

Link number 1 is dead. The year doesn't seem to be exact. In Trieste. Un'identità di frontiera di Angelo Ara and Claudio Magris, Torino: Enaudi 2007, 3rd edition, p. 71 the year 1898 is named. The party was founded, by the way, in Trieste. I would like to exchange these informations. Any objections? Berci (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yugoslav Social-Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology as "socialist" or "social democracy"

Someone reverted my edit changing their ideology like so. I would hold that in the context before 1914, before the fracturing of the Second International, Soc. Dem'cy would be a more precise term. At that time, it referred to Marxist parties, while socialism was a more general term. It's also, of course, the term they used in their own name. Nevertheless, both terms would be accurate and it's certainly not worth starting an edit war over, so I'll leave it as is. Nicknimh (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to User:Vif12vf who made the reversion: please note that you also reverted a correction (relating to the units of AH) in the same edit distinct from the point you found objectionable. I have just put that back in myself, but in the future please take care on such things. Thanks. Nicknimh (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]