Talk:Zadok

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Zadok which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 09:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

how do we participate?! (the link does not work!)--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
That was last year, when the title of the article was Zadok (High Priest). Dougweller (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

We should move it back to Zadok (High Priest), and start using Zadok_(disambiguation) and the new Other Zadok's section I added on this article to keep things straight between the various Zadok's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bibleuspro (talkcontribs) 04:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Construction[edit]

I have made multiple insertions to the page along with numerous edit's, but much work is needed in terms of cleanup and 'removal of repetitive information', pls help if you can. I hope to be able to tidy up soon..--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 23:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Related rename[edit]

Please see Talk:Sons of Zadok. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Dead Sea Scrolls section[edit]

Seems to be blatant speculation based on a naïve perceived similarity between "zedek" and "tzadok". Rubbish! Propose to delete section as lacking citations, as being ridiculous and silly. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 12:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Why not insert [citation needed]s and then, if demand is not met within a reasonable time, delete? PraeceptorIP (talk) 19:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Elkanah prophecy[edit]

The article says that the 1 Samuel 2:35 prophecy was by Elkanah. What is the support for identifying the prophet as Elkanah? It seems that the Bible only says "a man of God came to Eli and said to him..." in 1 Samuel 2:27. Cmcqueen1975 (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

This is a good point. I changed the article to use the passive tense without attribution to anybody, so that it is now neutral. Perhaps there should be a footnote to 1 Sam 2:27 and explanatory parenthetical. (?) PraeceptorIP (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)