Talk:Zulu Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Wikipedia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reliable?

Fram, regarding [this edit], can you be specific? The applicable clause is "Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." The link is from my blog, and I have been quoted here and here and contributed an article here on the topic. Independent Newspapers is South Africa's largest media company, so would suggest it fits the bill as reliable third party. The article on my personal blog provides the best summary of the situation, to my mind. I suggest that someone coming to an encyclopedia and wanting to find out more about the topic would benefit more from having it there than not, which is the ultimate principle. However, since there's a conflict of interest, I'll leave it other editors to decide and to restore if they wish. Greenman (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article

100 < articles < 1000 is tiny, this article isn't notable, less all the other wikis out there with the same amount of pages become notable! See the navbox of wikis for more info. @Yamla: do your thing. 94.193.111.99 (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]