Talk:Zurcher v. Stanford Daily

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stanford University Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Stanford University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Stanford UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Stanford UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Stanford UniversityStanford University articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alel19. Peer reviewers: Slsnw12, Vanessgu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zurcher v. Stanford Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120111174327/http://www.paloaltohistory.com:80/the-stanford-daily-search.php to http://www.paloaltohistory.com/the-stanford-daily-search.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Planned overhaul

I will be editing this article as a part of a school research assignment this quarter. I plan to add more factual background and the procedural posture of the case (how it got to the Supreme Court and how courts below decided the case). I also plan to elaborate on the impact of the case which the current version only briefly touches on in mentioning the Privacy Protection Act of 1980.

I plan to read Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547 and the Privacy Protection Act of 1980. I will also read Citicasters, Inc. v. McCaskill, 883 F. Supp. 1282, a similar case that was decided after the passage of the Privacy Protection Act of 1980. I am also going to read a law review article for background on the topic and the impact of the case: Elizabeth B. Uzelac, Reviving the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, 107 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1437, 1464 (2013).

Please let me know if you have any feedback or if there are other sources you recommend I explore to write on this topic. Thank you! Alel19 (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any problems, just ask. I added a section header to your note so it is easy to fine. To get a feel note that the Stanford Daily archives are all online. Probably not too good for citable source material but can give you a feel for the campus atmosphere at the time. Also Stanford in Turmoil: Campus Unrest, 1966-1972 by Richard Lyman (then University President) may discuss it (though you might not have easy access to the book). --Erp (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex's comment

The entry looks really good and your plan to read the relevant stat., cases and law review articles is great. One of the interesting aspects of the case that caught me is the statutory fix after the case and you, of course, have already pointed it out. Look forward to learning more about this case. Alex2018ALR (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC) Alex[reply]