Template:Did you know nominations/Örbyhus Castle
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 04:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Örbyhus Castle
[edit]
- ... that the Swedish king Eric XIV was imprisoned and ultimately died in Örbyhus Castle (pictured)?
5x expanded by Yakikaki (talk). Self nominated at 09:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC).
Hook fine, certainly expanded from a tiny stub. Pic fine too. I have corrected the link to Eric XIV of Sweden. All good! —Brigade Piron (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
This review needs more details, in accordance with DYK review instructions. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYK Reviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 12:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- I believed it a matter of WP:Good faith that when I reviewed the article, I followed the article guidelines meticulously. That I don't write a full blow-by-blow report of my review (I notice 20 separate fields of verification!) is perhaps understandable. But since Yoninah doesn't agree:
- The article is (i) suitably expanded, (ii) at least 1,500 characters long, (iii) neutral, (iv) contains inline citations (including hook's assertion). The hook is (v) within 150 characters, (vi) interesting and cited and (vii) neutral and without BLP implications. The image is (viii) free, (ix) used in the article and (x) clear at such a small size. Perhaps Yakikaki should actually review another article though? —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Since all the sources are in Swedish, this will be a gray AGF tick when it's approved. I pinged Yakikaki on his talk page. Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm not sure why I was pinged? As it says above, I reviewed this article: Template:Did you know nominations/Afghan pika. Best, Yakikaki (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Confirming Yakikaki did review Afghan pika. Based on the rest of this review by Brigade Piron, this nomination passes. — Maile (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
