Template:Did you know nominations/1994 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Valereee (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
1994 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- ... that Wycombe Wanderers secured back-to-back promotions when they won the 1994 Football League Third Division play-off Final?
5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 16:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Needs a source. - Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC) -->
- "Wycombe Wanderers had gained promotion from non-League football when they finished the 1992–93 Football Conference as champions and as such were making their first appearance in the play-offs in their first season in the Football League.[8]" + "No further goals were scored and Wycombe were promoted to the Second Division at their first attempt.[7][12][13]" The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I meant that a source should be added to the hook itself, per the rule/scriteria at the DYK checklist. A simple [1] will do. Ping me when you reply or have done so. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Where do you propose adding that citation? The fact albeit spread across two sentences is fully cited and we don't need to artificially create cited text to satisfy DYK. WP:V is satisfied, right? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Guess you're right as the criteria says to simply check if the hook has a source. With that being said, there are no other issues, so this hook is good to go.
Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Guess you're right as the criteria says to simply check if the hook has a source. With that being said, there are no other issues, so this hook is good to go.
- Where do you propose adding that citation? The fact albeit spread across two sentences is fully cited and we don't need to artificially create cited text to satisfy DYK. WP:V is satisfied, right? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I meant that a source should be added to the hook itself, per the rule/scriteria at the DYK checklist. A simple [1] will do. Ping me when you reply or have done so. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- "Wycombe Wanderers had gained promotion from non-League football when they finished the 1992–93 Football Conference as champions and as such were making their first appearance in the play-offs in their first season in the Football League.[8]" + "No further goals were scored and Wycombe were promoted to the Second Division at their first attempt.[7][12][13]" The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 09:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
