Template:Did you know nominations/2002 ICC Champions Trophy
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
2002 ICC Champions Trophy
[edit]- ... that India and Sri Lanka shared 2002 ICC Champions Trophy after the final was washed out twice?
- Reviewed: Preity Zinta filmography
Created/expanded by Sahara4u (talk). Self nominated at 01:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC).
- Don't you think you should some different fact? Same hook but with slightly different wording was used for Template:Did you know nominations/2002 ICC Champions Trophy Final. --User:Vigyani 07:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- I also see that you have re-cycled the text also from 2002 ICC Champions Trophy Final. How will this nomination be valid under 5X expansion criteria ? --User:Vigyani 07:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT ... that the 2002 ICC Champions Trophy was the first tournament during which the teams of all International Cricket Council member nations visited Sri Lanka?
- @Vigyani: hook changed. Expanded the article, now this is more than fivefold even if you exclude the "Knockout Matches" section! --Khadar Khani (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Full review needed now that previous issues have been worked on. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- The squad listings do not have citations, plus why are there two Statistics sections? Additionally, the criticism section on the final needs some copyediting. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- @ViperSnake151: done as suggested! --Khadar Khani (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- The squad listings do not have citations, plus why are there two Statistics sections? Additionally, the criticism section on the final needs some copyediting. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- I still think the criticism section is redundant because its just copy-pasted from the finals article, and is only about the final and not about criticism from across it as a whole. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)