Template:Did you know nominations/Apotheosis (film)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Apotheosis (film)
[edit]- ... that John Lennon and Yoko Ono were heckled when they didn't ride in a hot air balloon? http://www.eadt.co.uk/ea-life/when-john-lennon-brought-a-lot-of-hot-air-to-suffolk-1-747770 "John and Yoko didn't take off on the flight, climbing out of the basket after the photographs to oversee the launch - to shouts of "chicken!" from the gathered crowd")
Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Self-nominated at 21:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC).
everything checks out fine, and I made a couple of administrative tweaks, but the one thing that jars is the use of the contraction (isn't) which we don't normally allow. I like the tone and feeling of the hook though, and making it "did not ride" would stifle it a little too much. Any ideas? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that John Lennon and Yoko Ono were heckled for not riding in a hot air balloon?
- What about that? Also, No Swan So Fine, I'm really glad to see someone writing an article on this. hinnk (talk) 03:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, ALT1 gets my vote. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The QPQ was not complete, as the nominator didn't provide a QPQ of his own. Yoninah (talk) 22:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yoninah that QPQ review is as comprehensive as most, what's the reason you ping me? The Rambling Man (talk) 22:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: yes, it is comprehensive per most of the DYK criteria, except it neglected to note that the QPQ requirement wasn't submitted. @The Rambling Man: therefore it isn't considered an adequate QPQ review, and you shouldn't approve this nomination until the QPQ is complete. Best, Yoninah (talk) 11:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- I don't follow. This editor has submitted this for review, and has reviewed another item, hence has performed their QPQ. I fail to see your point. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, it's a never-ending snake. I get it. Oh well. This is fine for me, do with it as you please. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Replacing tick as this matter has been resolved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)