Template:Did you know nominations/Brookesia betschi

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Brookesia betschi[edit]

(
)

Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 16:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Date, length (just) OK. The (admirably short) hook is confirmed by an online reference. But I just wonder if the word "affected" should be replaced by "threatened" to make a more interesting hook. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Great! --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Per WT:DYK, after editing by Mandarax, article is now only 1230 characters, and currently ineligible. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I have added further information to this article and it is now at 1766 characters and ready for reassessment. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Adding a "re-review" icon.... I've also added a {{DYKmake}} for Cwmhiraeth. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 09:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
I was going to re-review this but wound up re-writing a goodly chunk of it, so someone else will have to. Now up to 1863 characters. Choess (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Everything checks out. Article definitely long enough (even after I removed duplicated text) and hook fact is interesting and cited. No other problems with text as far as I can see. Good to go Moswento talky 11:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Brookesia_betschi&oldid=828906618"