- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Hesperian (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Expanded fivefold, beginning on the 9th, so sufficiently and recently enough. Topic appears to be adequately covered, and article is clear and well organised, except I found one left-over misspelling from the pre-expansion version that rendered the sentence unclear, and one misplaced sentence; both fixed. Adequate referencing, from reliable sources, and I checked about half, including those used most often, and found no overly close paraphrasing. The hook fact has a reference and checks out, and is interesting. The only problem I found is that the Boland reference appears to be to the wrong page - I found Eucalyptus robusta on p. 298, not p. 88. Sort that out and it'll be good to go. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed now. That was really weird. I've not written about Cochlospermum from that book so not a leftover cut and paste. Anyway, fixed now. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)