Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Fatou Kiné Camara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Fatou Kiné Camara

[edit]
Fatou Kiné Camara
Fatou Kiné Camara
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Honor Smith

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 00:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Note: I'm still new at reviewing DYKs.
  • Image is appropriately licensed as cc-by-sa-2.0, in the article and works at small size (although I wonder if it might be better to have a tighter crop to get rid of the water bottle in the foreground?)
  • Article was moved into mainspace on 4 Nov (new enough) and has a prose size of 2093 characters (long enough)
  • Hook is stated in article and sourced by refs which support the hook. Hook is also interesting and neutral.
  • All non-lede paragraphs are referenced.
  • Don't seem to be any issues with copyright violations/close paraphrasing (although most of the references being in French makes this a bit trickier to detect automatically).
  • QPQ has been done.
  • because I don't have access to source [2]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Umimmak (talkcontribs) 04:03, 5 November 201 (UTC)
Fatou Kiné Camara
Fatou Kiné Camara
  • Hi Umimmak. Thanks for the review, looks like you have covered everything to me. Just a couple of things, it is usual to notify the nominator once you have reviewed, either by pinging them (by mentioning their name) or dropping a note on their talk page just in case they are not watching the review page, and you forgot to sign your review. I have uploaded a tighter crop of the image and replaced the one on the article. I think you are right about the water bottle. The image is now also better for viewing at small scale, as on the main page. Many thanks - Dumelow (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)