Template:Did you know nominations/Frédéric Gounongbe
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 18:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Frédéric Gounongbe[edit]
- ... that the footballer Frédéric Gounongbe holds a bachelor's degree in international business?
- ALT1:... that the footballer Frédéric Gounongbe originally regarded tennis as his preferred sport?
5x expanded by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 09:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC).
Article is both new and long enough. The English citation for the hook does not state that Gounongbe holds a bachelor's degree in international business, only that he studied business. As long as the French citation gives the information it is fine, although finding an additional reference in English would be preferable. I am partial to the second hook; it is more interesting and doesn't have the same sourcing issue. Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- I used Google translate for the French reference which translated it as: "Gounongbé also graduated with a Bachelor in International Business in Brussels EPHEC." I included the second reference as it mentions he studied a baccalaureate and business but is not specific about it. If that is not solid enough, I'm more than happy to go with the alternate hook in it's place. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
@Alexislynn(BYU): you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. So far you've confirmed newness, length, and cited hook fact. Yoninah (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Alexislynn fell ill, so I'm happy to finish the review. The article appears to be neutral. It looks like this is Kosack's 5th DYK nomination so QPQ is not required.Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Rachel Helps (BYU), neutrality and QPQ are important, but you have not commented on whether the newly added information is sufficient to support the original hook, nor have you covered all of the "Within policy" criteria listed above this edit window. Can you please check these in order to complete the review? (The close paraphrasing/copyvio/plagiarism check is especially important.) Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- 5x expansion checks out within the requisite timeframe. There are no copyvios that I can find. The article is neutrally written, and cited inline to reliable sources. Both hooks are cited inline (one of the sources is in french, but google translate says it supports the content in question). The web sources are not quite ideal, but acceptable, IMO; it's hardly controversial information. Since both hooks are okay, hook choice is with the promoter. Vanamonde (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
