Template:Did you know nominations/Girlamatic
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Girlamatic
[edit]- ... that an anthology of girl-friendly webcomics like those on Girlamatic "would sink like a stone" in the male-dominated direct market of comics? Source: Publisher's Weekly
- ALT1:... that Girlamatic featured both a blog about anime and comics, as well as a blog about dolls? Source: Comic Book Resources
- ALT2:... that the editor of webcomic subscription service Girlamatic originally wanted to call the website "ModernGirls", but this name was already taken by a porn site? Source: Sequential tart
- Reviewed: List of Airplay 100 number ones of the 2010s
- Comment: ALT0 might be considered outdated? My preference goes to ALT2.
5x expanded by Maplestrip (talk). Self-nominated at 14:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC).
5x expansion verified. No close paraphrasing was detected, and the article is for the most part adequately sourced. Of the three hooks, I think ALT2 is the best one and the one that would appeal the most to a general audience; it is cited inline and it has been verified. A QPQ (a review of a sadly-failed nomination) has been done. This should be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Naruto! I am glad my DYK meets the criteria! :) ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)