Template:Did you know nominations/Jesus nahm zu sich die Zwölfe, BWV 22

 The following is an archived discussion of Jesus nahm zu sich die Zwölfe, BWV 22's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC).

Jesus nahm zu sich die Zwölfe, BWV 22

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Bach composed his cantata Jesus nahm zu sich die Zwölfe, BWV 22, as an audition piece for the post of Thomaskantor in Leipzig, displaying a "sheer range of forms and musical expression"?

• Reviewed: Mary Jane Phillips-Matz
• Comment: Bach cantata for Quinquagesima, 10 February

Created/expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 21:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

• This is a nice improvement! Prose was increased 5x, well sourced, AGF on the German source. The hook is good, I know that JS is the "default" Bach but might be best to either specify for less experienced readers or link to the JS Bach page. QPQ is fine. The hook comes from the lead but it needs to be directly cited inline. Once that is done we should be fine to move forward. Allecher (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for a thorough review. Some think to link Bach is overlinking ;) I added an online source to the offline Dürr, for the first part of the fact, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for the additional source. I would still like to see a footnote (inline citation) on the second sentence of the article just to make it clear for the hook.

• I am not sure what you mean. The second sentence is in the lead, which is only a summary, without citations. The fact is mentioned twice in the body, both cited now, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Aha, I see now. It looks like everything is in order. Allecher (talk) 02:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)