Template:Did you know nominations/Magnetic anomaly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 20:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Magnetic anomaly[edit]

5x expanded by Yuriybrisk (talk), RockMagnetist (talk). Nominated by RockMagnetist (talk) at 18:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC).

Symbol voting keep.svg Article was expanded 5x within 5 days of DYK submission; article is long enough and has adequately references (though most sources are off-line) with no evidence of plagiarism; hook is appropriate length with off-line reference taken in good faith.--Orygun (talk) 04:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg By DYK rules, those sentences in the article that contain hook facts must be individually sourced. In this case, that's the Measurement section, second paragraph, first sentence. Please add an inline source citation for that sentence, even if it duplicates one or the other of the sources at the end of the paragraph, which it might or might not do. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: I added a couple of citations. Both can be verified online if you search "fluxgate magnetometer submarine". @Orygun: Pretty much all of the material in the article was accessible online when I added it, but Google Books and Amazon seem to provide inconsistent access. RockMagnetist (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Symbol voting keep.svg Have confirmed in-line citation is now in place. DYK should now be good to go.--Orygun (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC)