Template:Did you know nominations/Metta Lillie

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Joseph2302 (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Metta Lillie

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be written and kept by a Swedish woman? Source: Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be kept by a Swedish woman which is still extant,Metta Lillie earliest Swedish diary keeper
  • ALT1:... that Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be written and kept by a Swedish woman, which is still preserved? Source: Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be kept by a Swedish woman which is still extant,Metta Lillie earliest Swedish diary keeper
  • ALT2:... that Metta Lillie was the first Swedish woman to write and keep a diary, which is still extant? Source: Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be kept by a Swedish woman which is still extant,Metta Lillie earliest Swedish diary keeper
  • ALT3:... that Metta Lillie is the first known Swedish woman to write and keep a diary, which is still extant? Source: Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be kept by a Swedish woman which is still extant,Metta Lillie earliest Swedish diary keeper
  • ALT4:... that Metta Lillie is the first known Swedish women diarist? Source: Metta Lillie wrote the earliest diary known to be kept by a Swedish woman which is still extant,Metta Lillie earliest Swedish diary keeper

Created by Tamingimpala (talk). Self-nominated at 09:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC).

• Article was new enough and long enough at the time of the nomination. Nominator has only one prior DYK credit so no QPQ is needed. Prefer the original hook. While the hook is verified to a link given here in the article, that link isn't in the article currently (indeed, none of the sources in the article currently appear to mention the hook fact at all). In addition, the sentence mentioning the hook lacks a footnote. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I think we should be good to go with ALT0 since the issues have been addressed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• Article is much too short now that the copyrighted material has been removed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)