Template:Did you know nominations/Mona Lisa replicas & reinterpretations
The following is an archived discussion of Mona Lisa replicas & reinterpretations's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mona Lisa replicas & reinterpretations
[edit]( )
- ... that at least six nudes (an example pictured) are among the numerous Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations dating back to the original painting's creation in the 16th century?
- Comment: possibly ready-to-go as-is, but still working on it of course. I'm concerned because some of my references were deleted after going public, though the refs covered some common-knowledge content. Just thought I'd go ahead and put'er out there anyway and wait on line while attending to details.
Created by Penwatchdog (talk). Self nominated at 07:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC).
- ALT1 hook: ... that seaweed, coffee, and toast are among the many mediums which have been used to create Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations? (unfortunately no image for this one, unless someone can whip one up. Penwatchdog (talk) 07:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- ALT2 hook (new image obtained, at right) ... that Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations have been created using everything from seaweed to software (pictured)? Penwatchdog (talk) 06:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
(Candle Creek reviewed by Penwatchdog (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC))
Well-developed article fitting all the criteria, and ALT2 is an interesting and short hook. igordebraga ≠ 04:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
