Template:Did you know nominations/Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände

Therese Huber around 1820
Therese Huber around 1820
  • ... that the 19th century German journal Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände was most successful under its only female editor, Therese Huber (pictured)? Source: Das von Johann Friedrich Cotta als nicht-politisches Gegenstück zur Allgemeinen Zeitung gegründete Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände (1807–1865) erlebte unter Therese Hubers Redaktionstätigkeit 1817–1823 seine wohl erfolgreichste und überlieferungsgeschichtlich aufschlussreichste Zeit [...] Ihren Höhepunkt – den Absatz von 1810 Exemplaren – erreichte die Auflage während der Redaktionszeit von Therese Huber. Heuser, Magdalene (2013-08-01). "Lektüre – Übersetzung – Vermittlung. Therese Hubers Redaktionstätigkeit für Cottas Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände". Oxford German Studies. 42 (2): 158–172.
    • ALT1:... that as editor of the Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände, Therese Huber (pictured) was the first woman in Germany with a salaried editorial position? Source: Therese Huber ist insgesamt die erste Frau, die zeitweilig den Lebensunterhalt für ihre Familie durch eine feste Redaktionsstelle selbst erwerben kann. Anz, Thomas; Baasner, Rainer (2004). Literaturkritik: Geschichte, Theorie, Praxis (in German). C.H.Beck. pp. 61–62

Moved to mainspace by Kusma (talk). Self-nominated at 11:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC).

Interesting paper and fact, on substantial sources, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and shows the woman and the period well. Perhaps drop "19th-century" and rather describe daily and/or literary, or translate the unusual title. I like the first hook better, because it's more about the paper than her. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Prep builders don't want to have to think. My take is this, and perhaps some else would approve it. Or you word something that I can approve.
ALT2: ... that the literary journal Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände was most successful under its only female editor, Therese Huber (pictured)? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt, the slight issue with that is that it was not only a literary journal, although that is what it is most famous for these days. Here is one with a translated title (saving an extra "journal"), another variation of the ALT0 you approved and with the same source:
ALT3: ... that the 19th century Morning Paper for the Educated Classes was most successful under its only female editor, Therese Huber (pictured)?
I think the century is useful for context. —Kusma (t·c) 21:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The slight issue with that one is that while it's precise in the century, the locality is wide open, while the flavour of the German title puts it somewhere. Also, as long as the image with caption 1820 is taken, we don't have to teach that it is the 19th century. Trying harder:
ALT4: ... that the cultural and literary journal Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände was most successful under its only female editor, Therese Huber (pictured)? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt, good point about the image caption. ALT4 works for me. —Kusma (t·c) 04:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! For formality's sake, someone else should review that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Checked ALT4, hook is in the article, with reference (in German). Struck others per above. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)