Template:Did you know nominations/Panama-Pacific commemorative coin issue
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Panama-Pacific commemorative coin issue
[edit]- ... that the octagonal $50 piece of the Panama-Pacific commemorative coin issue (pictured) is the only U.S. coin that is not round?
- ALT1:... that the $50 pieces from the Panama-Pacific commemorative coin issue (octagonal variety pictured) are the largest and heaviest U.S. coins?
- Reviewed: Zézé
Created/expanded by Wehwalt (talk). Self nominated at 17:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC).
- Wow, what an article. Comprehensive, well-written and well-referenced (AGF on offline sources). Hook is cited, image is OK, QPQ done, but a question: in the Background section it says that there were other coins "struck by Augustus Humbert for the U.S. Assay Office at San Francisco" that were octagonal. would that not invalidate the hook's assertion? Or is it because they were not official federal coinage? If so, perhaps some tweak of the phrasing (adding "official" or "federal" perhaps) might be necessary to avoid confusion. Constantine ✍ 14:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- They were not authorized by Congress, and therefore were not "money" in a certain legal sense. I'll tweak it. Thank you for the kind words--Wehwalt (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Following your clarification, this is good to go. Constantine ✍ 16:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- They were not authorized by Congress, and therefore were not "money" in a certain legal sense. I'll tweak it. Thank you for the kind words--Wehwalt (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)