Template:Did you know nominations/Sonderkommando photographs

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 05:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Sonderkommando photographs

(

)

... that the Sonderkommando photographs (pictured) of events around the Auschwitz gas chambers in 1944 were smuggled out of the camp in a toothpaste tube?

Reviewed: United States Lighthouse Society

Created by SlimVirgin (talk). Self nominated at 01:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC).

Once the self-nominator reviews the other noms, let's run it. Great hook, good article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

(I'm assuming Oiyarbepsy's comment is just in support rather than purporting to be a review, so...) New enough; long enough; no close-paraphrasing, copyvio, or plagiarism from the sources I could check; neutral; citations where required; hook fact accurate and cited (I cut "images" as photographs can't be much else). The image is usable but I'm in two minds whether it is a good DYK image: it is blurry and indistinct at this size (but it is still fairly blurry and indistinct at full size) and it is the cropped version which is less powerful; I'll put the pressure on the prep-builder to decide. Ready, once the QPQ is done. Belle (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks, Oiyarbepsy and Belle. I've restored "images" just to break up the sentence a little. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 18:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Belle, just noting that I removed "images" again. Now that "pictured" is added, that serves to break the sentence up a bit, so it doesn't need the extra clause. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 06:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
That's fine (you know I didn't think it was necessary anyway :)) Belle (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Belle, I see you passed this as ready, but have left the question mark on it, which I think means it won't be promoted. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
I was just waiting for you to complete the QPQ (which you've done; though you've reintroduced the horrible "headquartered" which will have all right-thinking British readers clawing at their eyes ... or tutting ... or raising an eyebrow slightly) Belle (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

I think headquartered is okay in the UK. There are examples on Google Books of the British government using it (e.g. here). SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
If we've reached the point of taking writing advice from government... [Nasional Cirriculum Skuad smasshes frew windo, threws smokk bom, snatshes Bell] Leeder: "Nuffin too sea hear, moov alonge." Belle (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Ready (see above). Belle (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, and thanks again for the review. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)