The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 04:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
... that Susan Stover has received multiple awards for her research into the causes and prevention of performance-related injuries in racehorses.
ALT1:... that Susan Stover helped create a "track in a box" to study how simulated hoof impacts in racehorses are affected by different racing surfaces.
Article length ok, hooklines ok, interesting content. Only significant issue is that I assume this person is living, therefore needs a Category:Living people template added. May be a good idea to see what other categories she fits in. yorkshiresky (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Categories added. Sorry about that! Jlvsclrk (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Good to go! Good article, not crucial but be good if you could source a picture. yorkshiresky (talk)
OK, done the 5 points check. unfortunately fails as it was more than 7 days old when nominated and although expanded not by five fold. Apologies for missing this. yorkshiresky (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Yorkshiresky, can you clarify the date rule for me: I created the article in my sandbox and then Montanabw promoted in on August 26 when we'd gone through a few rounds of edits. So I believe the article date should be August 26, since that's when it was first on Wiki proper - after all, if I'd done a copy-paste of the sandbox content, that's what would have shown up. Am I wrong? Jlvsclrk (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
It clearly passes the date rule, the clock starts when it moves into mainspace. Montanabw(talk) 23:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The article was moved to mainspace with this edit on August 26, so it meets the newness requirement. Yorkshiresky, if you are going to continue with this review, you must explicitly cite the criteria that you check. "OK, done the 5 points check" doesn't tell us anything. You may wish to use the Reviewer's Template in the toolbox on the right. Yoninah (talk) 22:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Article length ok, hooklines ok, interesting content. Only significant issue is that I assume this person is living, therefore needs a Category:Living people template added. May be a good idea to see what other categories she fits in. yorkshiresky (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Good to go! Good article, not crucial but be good if you could source a picture. yorkshiresky (talk)
@Yorkshiresky: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 16:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
OK, done the 5 points check. unfortunately fails as it was more than 7 days old when nominated and although expanded not by five fold. Apologies for missing this. yorkshiresky (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The article was moved to mainspace with this edit on August 26, so it meets the newness requirement. Yorkshiresky, if you are going to continue with this review, you must explicitly cite the criteria that you check. "OK, done the 5 points check" doesn't tell us anything. You may wish to use the Reviewer's Template in the toolbox on the right. Yoninah (talk) 22:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
