The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Looks good to me in general, marking as a second opinion since I'm not very experienced with DYK reviews yet, so I would absolutely value anyone who notices a mistake on my part to point it out to me directly. I have slight reservations about the reliability of the sources; although this is a personal thing, I don't really have hard reasoning to object to, and given the context of the topic, it should be fine. Besides sourcing, I would give it a , a religious leader banning animal sacrifices is pretty interesting, and all the boxes are checked. PixDeVlyell talk to me! 21:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@PixDeVl: Thanks for this review. Regarding the source, Kuensel is a major newspaper in Bhutan and as such should be considered trustworthy unless determined otherwise. Our own article on Kuensel says is the national newspaper of the Kingdom of Bhutan. It was the only local newspaper available in Bhutan until 2006 when two more newspapers were launched.. Now for the fact itself, we will have to go with what the newspaper quotes. Ktin (talk) 02:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ktin: Hm, alright then! Ideally, someone else would see this and review it soon, but if not, I'd probably be fine looking again(although a second set of eyes is better than a second look) and approving(I already felt comfortable enough to fully approve another nom anyway). I'll check back on this tomorrow afternoon. --PixDeVlyell talk to me! 03:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Checking in on this one, @PixDeVl:. Appreciate your actions. Ktin (talk) 00:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Request to the promoting admin -- would like for the hook to be slotted in the picture slot of an upcoming set. No concerns with the additional wait. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 19:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ktin; the image is not great-quality and is not focused very well on the subject. It will not go into the picture slot, as there are many much more suitable, attractive, and interesting images available. Hope that's understandable, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me in general, marking as a second opinion since I'm not very experienced with DYK reviews yet, so I would absolutely value anyone who notices a mistake on my part to point it out to me directly. I have slight reservations about the reliability of the sources; although this is a personal thing, I don't really have hard reasoning to object to, and given the context of the topic, it should be fine. Besides sourcing, I would give it a 
, a religious leader banning animal sacrifices is pretty interesting, and all the boxes are checked. PixDeVl